Current:Home > InvestThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -WealthStream
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
View
Date:2025-04-13 01:38:37
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (12)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Huge Western Fires in 1910 Changed US Wildfire Policy. Will Today’s Conflagrations Do the Same?
- 10 Best Portable Grill Deals Just in Time for Summer: Coleman, Cuisinart, and Ninja Starting at $20
- House Votes to Block Trump from Using Clean Energy Funds to Back Fossil Fuels Project
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Read the full text of the dissents in the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling by Sotomayor and Jackson
- No Drop in U.S. Carbon Footprint Expected Through 2050, Energy Department Says
- With Only a Week Left in Trump’s Presidency, a Last-Ditch Effort to Block Climate Action and Deny the Science
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
Ranking
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- The Idol Costume Designer Natasha Newman-Thomas Details the Dark, Twisted Fantasy of the Fashion
- The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
- Jessie J Pays Tribute to Her Boyfriend After Welcoming Baby Boy
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Read full text of the Supreme Court decision on web designer declining to make LGBTQ wedding websites
- Experts Divided Over Safety of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
- On the Frontlines of a Warming World, 925 Million Undernourished People
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 1)
Harvard, universities across U.S. react to Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling
EPA Plans to Rewrite Clean Water Act Rules to Fast-Track Pipelines
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
In Exxon Climate Fraud Case, Judge Rejects Defense Tactic that Attacked the Prosecutor
Elliot Page Shares Update on Dating Life After Transition Journey
Air Monitoring Reveals Troubling Benzene Spikes Officials Don’t Fully Understand